[BACK]Return to readme.html CVS log [TXT] [DIR] Up to [LON-CAPA] / loncom / build

Diff for /loncom/build/readme.html between versions 1.10 and 1.11

version 1.10, 2001/01/17 12:02:00 version 1.11, 2001/01/17 12:49:33
Line 1 Line 1
   <HTML>
   <HEAD>
   <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Scott Harrison and Emacs Version 3.14159265358979">
   <TITLE>LON-CAPA Software Developer Instructions</TITLE>
   </HEAD>
   <BODY>
 <H1>LON-CAPA Software Developer Instructions</H1>  <H1>LON-CAPA Software Developer Instructions</H1>
   
 <OL>  <OL>
Line 126  besides documentation). Line 132  besides documentation).
 </P>  </P>
 <P>  <P>
 Here is an example of a dynamically generated <TT>Makefile.build</TT>  Here is an example of a dynamically generated <TT>Makefile.build</TT>
 that builds two LON-CAPA files (one of which is <TT>tth.so</TT>.  that builds two LON-CAPA files (one of which is <TT>tth.so</TT>).
 <FONT COLOR="#330066">  <FONT COLOR="#330066">
 <PRE>  <PRE>
 all: ../homework/caparesponse/capa.so ../modules/TexConvert/tthperl/tth.so   all: ../homework/caparesponse/capa.so ../modules/TexConvert/tthperl/tth.so 
Line 145  alwaysrun: Line 151  alwaysrun:
 </P>  </P>
 <LI><A NAME="loncapafiles">  <LI><A NAME="loncapafiles">
     <H2>Adding/removing files from the LON-CAPA installation (doc/loncapafiles/loncapafiles.html)</H2>      <H2>Adding/removing files from the LON-CAPA installation (doc/loncapafiles/loncapafiles.html)</H2>
   <STRONG>To add and remove (and alter)</STRONG>
   All that you have to do to alter the behavior of the installation is
   edit a single file (<TT>doc/loncapafiles/loncapafiles.html</TT>).
   Adding, removing, and altering files requires proper attention
   to the syntax of file format of course.
   <STRONG>File Format</STRONG>
   <P>
   The preceding <A HREF=#"makebuild">"make build"</A> documentation
   gives an example <B>METAGROUP</B> entry describing one particular file.
   All data within <TT>loncapafiles.html</TT> is specified according
   to markup tags.  The format and syntax of <TT>loncapafiles.html</TT>
   is currently best described by the HTML documentation code at the beginning of
   loncapafiles.html (as well as, by example, seeing how various
   information is coded).  All in all, the syntax is quite simple.
   </P>
   <STRONG>Philosophy and notes (the thing nobody reads)</STRONG>
   <P>
   Packaging the software from CVS onto a machine file system requires many
   things:
   <UL>
   <LI>documenting every component of the software,
   <LI>handling CVS <U>source</U> to file system <U>target</U> information
   <LI>handling (according to a hierarchical scheme of grouping) file
   ownership and permissions,
   <LI>handling (according to a hierarchical scheme of grouping) directory
   ownership and permissions,
   <LI>handling symbolic links
   <LI>providing for multiple options of installation targets
   (RedHat versus Debian for instance),
   <LI>providing for different file ownerships and permissions to apply
   to the same file,
   <LI>allowing system software documentation to be automatically generated
   (see information on <A HREF="#makeHTML">"make html"</A>),
   <LI>providing information in an easily adjustable form as new demands
   are made on the software packaging system,
   <LI>providing software package information (for RPM),
   <LI>having information in a format that allows for troubleshooting
   the current status of the machine file system,
   <LI>allow for changes to the structure of the CVS repository,
   <LI>and something that is simple enough for any one to immediately work with,
   without having to learn specifics (or hidden traps) of complicated Makefile's
   or a new macro language (m4?).
   </UL>
   </P>
   <P>
   I looked into, and tried, different ways of accomplishing the above
   including automake and recursive make.  The automake system seemed quite
   complicated (and needlessly so in terms of this project since, by and large,
   it works to coordinate many different types of build/compilation parameters
   whereas we are more concerned with installation parameters).  Recursive make
   has significant deficiencies in the sense that not all the information
   is kept in one place, and there are significant levels of dependency
   between all the things that must be done to keep software packaging
   up to date.  A particularly convincing article I found when looking into
   much of this was
   <A HREF="http://www.pcug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html">
   "Recursive Make Considered Harmful" by Peter Miller</A>.  Complicating
   matters was, at the time, it was unclear as to what categories
   of software files we had, and whether or not the directory structure
   of CVS would remain constant.  With an ever-developing directory structure
   to CVS, I preferred to organize the information on a per-file basis
   as opposed to a per-directory basis (although there is a successful
   implementation of a standard big Makefile in <TT>loncom/Makefile</TT>).
   Additionally, a standard big Makefile assumes certain "normalcy" to
   the directory structure of different potential operating system directories
   (RedHat vs. Debian).
   </P>
   <P>
   If you take time to look at loncapafiles.html
   (and perhaps run the <A HREF="#makeHTML">make HTML</A> command)
   you will find that the organizing information according to the markup
   syntax in <TT>loncapafiles.html</TT> is simple.  Simple is good.
   </P>
   <P>
   <TT>loncom/build/parse.pl</TT> is the script (invoked automatically
   by the various targets in <TT>loncom/build/Makefile</TT>) that reads
   <TT>doc/loncapafiles/loncapafiles.html</TT>.  <TT>parse.pl</TT>
   is capable of reading and returning different types of information
   from <TT>loncapafiles.html</TT> depending on how <TT>parse.pl</TT>
   is invoked.  <TT>parse.pl</TT> has yet to have introduced new sources
   of error, and has been tested in quite a number of ways.  As with
   any parser however, I remain paranoid.
   </P>
   <P>
   My regrets with the current system is that <TT>parse.pl</TT> is
   slow (can take 1 minute to run) and includes a few tidbits of code,
   specific to the make process, that probably should be in
   <TT>loncom/build/Makefile</TT>.  Additionally, <TT>loncapafiles.html</TT>
   should have a DTD and all those other good SGML-ish things (and parsing
   should be done with a real SGML-derived parser).
   </P>
   <P>
   On the plus side, the <TT>parse.pl</TT>-<TT>loncapafiles.html</TT> 
   combination has been working very efficiently and error-free.
   </P>
 <LI><A NAME="configversusnonconfig">  <LI><A NAME="configversusnonconfig">
     <H2>Configurable files versus non-configurable files</H2>      <H2>Configurable files versus non-configurable files</H2>
 <LI><A NAME="makeinstall">  <LI><A NAME="makeinstall">
Line 154  alwaysrun: Line 255  alwaysrun:
 <LI><A NAME="makeRPM">  <LI><A NAME="makeRPM">
     <H2>Building RPMs (make RPM)</H2>      <H2>Building RPMs (make RPM)</H2>
 </OL>  </OL>
   </BODY>
   </HTML>
Removed from v.1.10  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.11

FreeBSD-CVSweb <freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org>